All parents should attend government parenting classes Essay

All parents should attend government parenting classes - Essay Example Nevertheless, a lot of queries might be brought up as to whether it is logical for parents to be left to raise their children without any interference given that there has been an increase in vices such as substance abuse, bulling and sometimes fatal fights. For new parents and those who have trouble when it comes to raising their children, parenting classes are a potential solution to helping them. Although some fear that parenting classes increase the socio-economic gap between citizens, government parenting classes will be beneficial in; mitigating the ripple effects of poor parenting on the society, upholding children’s rights to getting quality parenting and standardizing parenting information for reliability and consistency. All parents should go to government sponsored parenting classes because they will help reduce the negative impacts that bad parenting has on the society as a whole. According to Casey and Kirby (2006), in matters regarding the bringing up of its futu re citizens, the government has a firm financial, practical and moral concern. This is the reason why most democracies that are liberalist in nature extend pricey and broad child support systems in order to assist parents in the upbringing of young individuals who will turn out to be respectful, responsible, active and upright members of the society. These support systems include; arrangements for parental leave, nursery care that is free and payments for child support. Casey and Kirby (2006) also raise the contention that preventive and proactive action brings about the best outcomes as opposed waiting to deal with the problems after they arise. The successfulness and cohesiveness of the next generations could be ensured by the implementation of mandatory parenting classes hence raising parenting standards for the benefit of current and future generations. If all parents attended government parenting classes, children’s rights to getting quality parenting will be upheld. Dow ard (2006) argues that making parenting classes mandatory would in a great way aid in the prioritization of the children’s best interests without putting a restriction on the educational choices of these parents. This is because it might not be possible to put into place supervisory or legal systems that would provide encouragement to parents to take better care of their children. While merely having an effect on parents at a minimal degree, parenting classes would certainly aid parents in determining and acquiring knowledge as to what is considered to be good for their children; this would in turn enforce the right of a child to an upbringing that is decent. Bortolotti and Cutas (2009, p.17) give the argument that dealing with bad parenting will in effect cub child social exclusion. For instance, 90% of juvenile wrongdoers have been known to have a history of behavioural issues as children. Moreover, according to LaFollette (1980, p. 24), there are some instances in which a child’s failings are clearly as a result of poor parenting. For example, a fourteen year old boy or girl with poor health, a record of crime and no educational qualifications has almost surely been failed by his/her parents. It is therefore better if these classes are made mandatory for all parents since the government has no means of determining in advance which parents will specifically struggle in raising his/her child. For the betterment of the society at large, a